Exploring
Osmosis & Diffusion: A Case-Based Investigation By John S. Peters, PhD and Brian R. Scholtens, PhD |
||
Learning Theory & Pedagogy
The
more traditional highly guided &
context-independent science lab model typically uses
scientific methods but these kinds of labs usually
prompt students to follow (often mindlessly) a set of
science instructions, which guide students through a
process of finding out about something, for which “an
answer” or outcome is preplanned and already
known. Moreover, the lack of initial
student-centered context for the lab exploration sets
up an unengaged lab experience that is more akin to
blindly following a cookbook recipe, and like a
recipe, is often thought to have failed if the
expected results don’t materialize. This more
“cookbook” approach to science labs does little to
help students develop literate conceptions of the
nature of scientific knowledge (validity,
tentativeness, limitations, importance of experimental
design features, applications...).
Students are likely to be more invested in a science
lab if there is an initial lab context that is
centered around student interests and experiences and
they are allowed to make critical
decisions about the design and execution of the
experiment. So
the focus of this "practicing inquiry" lab is to build
on students understanding of how science is done, by
guiding them through some aspects of doing science,
but leaving many of the decisions (hypothesis
formation, aspects of experimental design and
predictions) up to the students. This elicits
student ownership of the experiment, generating
intrinsic interest in the outcome, while also giving
them practice applying important biological concepts
and practicing designing and interpreting experiments. Instructional Resources
Required
Materials
|