Genetically Modified
Foods
Problems/Case Studies
"Are Gene-Altered Plants an Ecological Threat?" Sherry L. Kitto
Dr.
During this exercise, students
consider the significance of crop plants to society. In part one,
student groups are encouraged to discuss the pros and cons of
weeds, herbicides, herbicide-resistant transgenic plants, and risk
and safety assessment. The main objective of the exercise,
accomplished during part two, is for student groups to
collaboratively design an experiment to prove or disprove an
hypothesis; that transgenes within a crop plant, e.g., Brassica
campestris, will be exchanged with related wild species of mustard
if allowed to grow to maturity in the field. In part three, each
student group gives a presentation outlining its experimental
plans for determining the invasiveness of transgenic brassica.
After the presentations, students are referred to actual
experiments in scientific reports. The exercise utilizes three
in-class periods, and follows a traditional lecture series, which
provides students with background information for the exercise.
Supporting
Materials: Format of
Delivery, Student Learning Objectives, Instructor Resources,
Author's Teaching Notes
"The
Case
of the “Tainted” Taco Shells - General Edition", "The Case
of the “Tainted” Taco Shells - Advanced Edition" Ann Taylor, Wabash
College. State University of New York at Buffalo’s National Center
for Case Study Teaching
This case discusses some of the issues
associated with the use of genetically modified plants, including
ecological risks, resistance, and allergenicity. The General
Edition emphasizes the basic biochemistry and scientific ethics
issues associated with genetically modified foods. The Advanced
Edition probes the same issues but includes more advanced
questions regarding the biochemistry of how genetically modified
plants “work."
This case is appropriate for
high school and college undergraduate general chemistry,
biochemistry, botany/plant science, and agricultural courses.
"Frankenfoods?
The
Debate
Over Genetically Modified Crops" Bill Rhodes,
Clemson University, Maha M. Alkhazindar, Cairo University, and
Nancy A. Schiller, University at Buffalo. State University of New
York at Buffalo’s National Center for Case Study Teaching
This discussion case, in which a
university research laboratory is vandalized by environmental
activists opposed to genetic engineering, focuses on the science
and ethics of genetically modified crops. Students consider both
the risks and benefits of biotechnology and explore the positions
of various stakeholders including environmentalists,
conservationists, agricultural businesses, research scientists,
and farmers.
Originally written for a
vegetable crops course, the case would be appropriate for a wide
variety of courses in which biotechnology is discussed.
"All
That
Glitters May Not Be Gold: A Troublesome Case of Transgenic Rice"
Gerald
F. Combs, Jr., Cornell University. State University of New York at
Buffalo’s National Center for Case Study Teaching
In this decision case, a congressional
staffer must weigh a number of competing concerns and issues,
including popular reactions to genetically modified organisms, in
deciding how to present information to her boss, an influential
congressman drafting legislation to support agricultural research.
The case explores the social and biological issues surrounding
micronutrient malnutrition, including deficiencies of several
vitamins and essential minerals, especially iron, iodine, and
vitamin A, which affect at least one-third of the world's
population, primarily in developing nations.
This case is appropriate for
college undergraduate botany/plant science, public health,
nutrition, agriculture, and biotechnology courses.
"Torn
at
the Genes: One Family's Debate Over Genetically Altered Plants".
Jennifer
Nelson, University at Buffalo. State University of New York at
Buffalo’s National Center for Case Study Teaching
The setting for this discussion case
study is the family dinner table, where a heated discussion about
genetically altered foods is taking place. The case considers both
the scientific and the ethical issues surrounding the genetic
alteration of plants.
This case is appropriate for
high school and college undergraduate biotechnology, genetics,
agriculture, and botany/plant science courses.
CNN Video Clips:
Topic: Tastier
Tomatoes: Biology 7th Ed. CNN Ed 2003 (2:53)
Scientists for the USDA have
identified a tomato gene that controls the rate at which the fruit
ripens. Manipulating this rin gene could make tasty tomatoes
available year round. The fruit could be allowed to stay on
the vine longer, making it redder and more nutritious. Then
the ripening process could be slowed after picking to prevent
softening and rotting. Similar genes in other fruits suggest
that they too might be candidates for genetic manipulation.
(Student worksheet provided on CD)
Topic:
Transgenic Tobacco: Biology 6th Ed. CNN Ed 2002 (2:00)
Researchers are hoping to put
tobacco plants to a new, healthier use. Tobacco is easy to grow
and to genetically engineer. One scientist describes it as “the
lab mouse of the plant world.” Tobacco has been engineered to
contain human genes and to produce human proteins for use as drugs
and vaccines. The genetically engineered plants are field grown,
harvested, and chopped up. The chopping triggers protein
production. Use of tobacco-produced proteins is estimated to be
several years away. (Student worksheet provided on CD)
Topic: Plants
to Mars: Biology 6th Ed. CNN Ed 2002 (2:01)
NASA scientists are planning to
send genetically engineered plants (Aradopsis) on an unmanned
mission to Mars in 2007. The plants will be grown in Martian soil
and will be engineered to contain foreign genes. For example, the
plants will contain a gene for a jellyfish protein and will glow
green when stressed. Observation of these “reporter” plants by
camera will allow scientists to evaluate how they respond to
Martian conditions. (Student worksheet provided on CD)
Topic: A Threat
to Monarchs?: Biology 5th Ed. CNN Ed 2001 (2:13)
Corn plants, bioengineered by
Monsanto to contain Bt genes, help farmers prevent damage by corn
borers. However, lab experiments by scientists at Cornell
University suggest that pollen from this corn may be a threat to
the larvae of other insects, including monarch butterfly
caterpillars. Monsanto argues that Bt corn is
environmentally friendly because it allows farmers to reduce
pesticide use and that the pollen is unlikely to contaminate
milkweed in the field. The worksheet includes the URL for
the home page of the principal investigator of the Cornell
University study. (Student worksheet provided on CD)
Bt corn: A threat to monarchs? Volume 5, 2001. (2:13)
Corn plants, bioengineered by Monsanto to contain Bt genes, help
farmers prevent damage by corn borers. However, lab
experiments by scientists at Cornell University suggest that
pollen from this corn may be a threat to the larvae of other
insects, including monarch butterfly caterpillars. Monsanto
argues that Bt corn is environmentally friendly because it allows
farmers to reduce pesticide use and that the pollen is unlikely to
contaminate milkweed in the field. The worksheet includes
the URL for the home page of the principal investigator of the
Cornell University study.
Articles in "Taking Sides"
"Should Genetically Modified Foods Be
Banned?" Easton, Thomas. Taking Sides: Science, Technology, and Society,
sixth edition.
Issue Summary:
- YES: Activists Martin Teitel and Kimberley A. Wilson argue
that genetically modified foods should be banned until their
safety for human consumption has been demonstrated. (from Genetically Engineered Food:
Changing the Nature of Nature, Park Street Press,
2001).
- NO: Ronald Bailey, science correspondent for Reason magazine, argues
that because genetically modified foods can save lives, they
should be available to those who need them. (from "Dr.
Strangelunch", Reason,
January 2001)
"Is Genetic Engineering an
Environmentally Sound Way to Increase Food Production?"
Easton, Thomas. Taking
Sides: Environmental Issues, eleventh edition.
Issue Summary:
- YES: The national academies of science of the United Kingdom,
the United States, Brazil, China, India, Mexico, and the Third
World argue that genetically modified crops hold the potential
to feed the world during the twenty-first century while also
protecting the environment. (from "Transgenic Plants and World
Agriculture", A Report Prepared Under the Auspices of the Royal
Society of London, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, the
Brazilian Academy of Sciences, the Chinese Academy of Sciences,
the Indian National Science Academy, the Mexican Academy of
Sciences, and the Third World Academy of Sciences, July 2000)
- NO: Brian Halweil, a researcher at the Worldwatch Institute,
argues that the genetic modification of crops threatens to
produce pesticide-restitant insect pests and herbicide-resistant
weeds, will victimize poor farmers, and is unlikely to feed the
world. (from "The Emperor's New Crops", World Watch, July/August
1999)